Relying on Labels

The meat section of your grocery store will be undergoing a transformation. As of March 1st, 2012, the majority of meat sold in the butcher case is required to bear nutrition labels. The labels will be just like the ones on other packaged foods, requiring specifics like calories, saturated fat, and protein to be disclosed (see image above).

Why the sudden interest in labeling meat products? Up until now, manufacturers had the option to voluntarily provide this information. However, recent surveys by the Food Safety and Inspection Service show limited participation in the program. Rising rates of chronic disease have prompted a closer look at how to empower consumers to make educated food choices, and making the voluntary meat label mandatory is seen as a way to give people essential nutrition information they can easily act upon. Having the details on these food products is likely to cause serious sticker shock for label readers. One serving of 95% lean ground beef (4 ounces, which is about the size of a deck of cards) is 154 calories, 2.5g of saturated fat, and 24.2g of protein. For more of the basics on what will and won’t be labeled, check out this article from WebMD. While there are some positives to the new disclosure coming to the meat department, this new ruling does bring us back to the question of the utility of labels.

At the end of the day, how many labels do we really need tell us that something is healthy or unhealthy? Maybe in this era of everything right here-right now, we have too many distractions to be able to focus on the basics. Under these circumstances a label is useful: it tells you what you need to make a good decision, and ideally what is most important. But when is a label a crutch, and when is it providing us with information that’s sorely needed? More importantly, what would it mean if we needed labels to give us information that we should just know? Should there be a line of acceptability when it comes to labels, or will we soon see a day when fresh produce carries stickers with nutrition facts to help us conclude they are healthy?

About these ads

About Sheila Viswanathan

Sheila Viswanathan focuses on educating individuals on how to make healthier dietary choices. She received her doctoral degree in Nutrition and Public Health from Teachers College, Columbia University and is certified as a registered dietitian. You can read more from Sheila over at The Lazy Dietitian.
This entry was posted in Home and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Relying on Labels

  1. Chris says:

    Nutrition labels are educating, but source and living conditions of what you are eating is more important. What the animal has been fed, exposed to. Watch the documentary Fresh. We play Russian roulette every time we eat meat from a livestock or poultry factory. I now stick to local sources and have cut my meat consumption down. Quality over quanity.

  2. Lovan says:

    @chris totally agree. Eating a burger, even if it is one with high fat content, is not a problem if done in moderation and as a part of a balanced diet.

    What is more important is what is in the burger. I’d be a lot happier if the label told me that there was ammonia in my meat rather the fat content.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/pink-slime-removed-from-mcdonalds-burgers–but-other-weird-food-additives-remain/2012/02/01/gIQAdfvAiQ_blog.html?utm_source=Triggermail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Live&utm_campaign=TTP%20|%20Connective%20Tissue%20Con%20Carne%20%28Lunchroom%20Lament%29

  3. Teri says:

    It’s not just food we have to be aware of the labels on. I’m starting a new business- one part retail of organic body care products whose companies FULLY disclose ingredients, the other part is holding workshops educating people on toxic ingredients in body care products. I just today had a horrible experience with a company whose products I was considering carrying, which shall remain nameless. I specifically asked whether they disclose 100% of the ingredients in their products and was told yes. I’ve used their products and read the ingredient labels. I was told the products have a 7 year shelf life. I questioned how they could have that long shelf life, with no preservative source listed and was told they use Vitamin E. Vitamin E is NOT on their list of ingredients! I know Vitamin E/Tocopherol carries health concerns (source Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep database). It’s time we all start looking past ingredient labels on both food and body care products, and really educate ourselves on what is ‘hidden’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s